Most common EDI transaction sets used by Third Party Logistics providers (3PL’s).
EDI transaction Q & A Question: Brian, our organization has decided to outsource our warehouse function to a 3PL (Third Party Logistics Provider)....
2 min read
Roger Leyden Wed, Jan 30, 2013
Question: Hi Roger, we recently got a contract to supply an organization in Germany which will require EDI. This would normally be no problem to us as we have been doing EDI with our North American trading partners for over four years; however, our new German contract requires us to use EDIFACT rather than X12 as their preferred EDI standard. Could you highlight the main differences between X12 and EDIFACT and suggest what I should do?
Answer: In 1979 the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) chartered the Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12 to develop uniform standards for inter-industry electronic exchange of business transactions – now known commonly as Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). These transaction sets, abbreviated to X12, are the predominant EDI standards used by organizations in North America today.
In 1986, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) approved the acronym "UN/EDIFACT," which translates to United Nations Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport. UN/EDIFACT is an international EDI standard designed to meet the needs of both government and private industry. EDIFACT is the most popular worldwide EDI data standard outside of North America.
Here is a brief list of some of the different names given to documents in the X12 and EDIFACT transactions sets. You will notice that X12 assigns numeric values to documents whereas EDIFACT lists names or abbreviations.
TRANSACTION SET/DOCUMENT |
X12 SET |
EDIFACT |
PRODUCT/PRICING TRANSACTIONS |
||
Price Sales Catalog |
832 |
PRICAT |
Price Authorization Acknowledgement/Status |
845 |
ATHSTS |
Specification/Technical Information |
841 |
PRDSPE |
Request For Quotation |
840 |
REQOTE |
ORDERING TRANSACTIONS |
||
Purchase Order |
850 |
ORDERS |
Purchase Order Acknowledgement |
855 |
ORDRSP |
Purchase Order Change |
860 |
ORDCHG |
Purchase Order Change Acknowledgement |
865 |
ORDRSP |
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS |
||
Planning Schedule/Material Release |
830 |
DELFOR |
Shipping Schedule |
862 |
DELJIT |
Production Sequence |
866 |
-- |
Ship Notice/manifest (ASN) |
856 |
DESADV |
SHIPPING/RECEIVING TRANSACTIONS |
||
Shipment Information (Bill of Lading) |
858 |
IFTMCS |
Receiving Advice |
861 |
RECADV |
Non-conformance Information-Disposition Transaction, Cause/Correction |
842 |
NONCON |
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT TRANSACTIONS |
||
Inventory Inquiry/Advice |
846 |
INVRPT |
Product Transfer and Resale Report |
867 |
SLSRPT |
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS |
||
Invoice |
810 |
INVOIC |
Freight Invoice |
859 |
IFTMCS |
Payment order/Remittance Advice (EFT) |
820 |
REMADV |
There are many differences between an X12 and an EDIFACT document and I would recommend that if you do not have the capabilities to do EDIFACT in house that you outsource to a strong global EDI solution provider who can handle both data formats. At B2BGateway, we have offices located in North America, Europe and Pacific/Asia regions and can handle all internationally recognized EDI data formats including not only X12 and EDIFACT but many, many more (Tradacoms in the UK for example).
For further information on B2Bgateway’s international data standards capabilities please visit www.B2BGateway.Net or call (401) 491 9595.
Roger Leyden is Director of Global Business Development at B2BGateway.
EDI transaction Q & A Question: Brian, our organization has decided to outsource our warehouse function to a 3PL (Third Party Logistics Provider)....
Advantages of adding Advance Ship Notices (ASN) and GS1-128 labels to your EDI supply chain process. Question: Roger, my retailer wants me to add ...
Question: Hi Louisa, I work for an automotive supplier and one of our customers recently stated that they wanted to start sending us an EDI 830...